COVID-19 and Fashion Transparency
Fashion Revolution’s Fashion Transparency Index shows how companies in the fashion industry are
mass producing with environmental and social sensitivity and awareness, and being open about it.
Especially with times changing and the defense for our environment on the rise, this index has really
helped keep companies in check. It has also helped shed light on some of the companies that need
improvement. The average score of all 250 companies analyzed is a sad 23%. While it is better than last
year, (which was 21%) 23% is still a very low number. Many athletic wear companies that were getting
heat in the 90s are up to 70%, while certain luxury companies are below 40%.
mass producing with environmental and social sensitivity and awareness, and being open about it.
Especially with times changing and the defense for our environment on the rise, this index has really
helped keep companies in check. It has also helped shed light on some of the companies that need
improvement. The average score of all 250 companies analyzed is a sad 23%. While it is better than last
year, (which was 21%) 23% is still a very low number. Many athletic wear companies that were getting
heat in the 90s are up to 70%, while certain luxury companies are below 40%.
This number means that many of these luxury clothing brands are not disclosing their manufacturing
policies and commitments. Some companies choose to not disclose for the purpose of a negative effect on
consumers. There are 10 brands that even scored a 0 on the index this past year. With the drastic effects of
COVID-19, many retailers are beginning to withdraw commitments from many of their manufacturers.
The question here is whether this is for the purpose of the shareholders or the workers? Many of the
products sold come from countries being greatly affected by COVID-19, and the demand for many
products is rapidly decreasing. This leaves a lot room for companies to become more transparent with
their use of manufacturers and such because most retail stores remain closed thus far. This means that
facilities are not having to overproduce to the level that many of them were, and therefore their stats do
not look like they normally do. The companies’ carbon emission, employee numbers, and other common
issues are greatly decreasing.
policies and commitments. Some companies choose to not disclose for the purpose of a negative effect on
consumers. There are 10 brands that even scored a 0 on the index this past year. With the drastic effects of
COVID-19, many retailers are beginning to withdraw commitments from many of their manufacturers.
The question here is whether this is for the purpose of the shareholders or the workers? Many of the
products sold come from countries being greatly affected by COVID-19, and the demand for many
products is rapidly decreasing. This leaves a lot room for companies to become more transparent with
their use of manufacturers and such because most retail stores remain closed thus far. This means that
facilities are not having to overproduce to the level that many of them were, and therefore their stats do
not look like they normally do. The companies’ carbon emission, employee numbers, and other common
issues are greatly decreasing.
There are many people that believe that this pandemic could cause a positive change in the fashion
industry. Companies becoming much more aware of their sales, quotas, and overproduction could truly
have a positive effect on the environment. Global brands are having to restructure their business models
in order to survive the economic crisis, and there are some who have not been able to survive and are
losing most if not all of their stores. The restructuring of business models is what is giving people hope
for the long-term. I hope retail companies do in fact become more environmentally and socially conscious
in the future because of the pandemic. There is so much that goes unseen and so many wrongdoings that
if we knew about them all I think there would definitely be a negative response from consumers, but the
point of the FTI is that if these companies do come clean and get backlash, it could force a real change in
their policies. I have a feeling we are quite a ways away from this, but it is the end goal, and I am
remaining hopeful.
industry. Companies becoming much more aware of their sales, quotas, and overproduction could truly
have a positive effect on the environment. Global brands are having to restructure their business models
in order to survive the economic crisis, and there are some who have not been able to survive and are
losing most if not all of their stores. The restructuring of business models is what is giving people hope
for the long-term. I hope retail companies do in fact become more environmentally and socially conscious
in the future because of the pandemic. There is so much that goes unseen and so many wrongdoings that
if we knew about them all I think there would definitely be a negative response from consumers, but the
point of the FTI is that if these companies do come clean and get backlash, it could force a real change in
their policies. I have a feeling we are quite a ways away from this, but it is the end goal, and I am
remaining hopeful.
Comments