hobbes, locke and rousseau yay!!!

What do the political philosophers Locke, Rousseau, and Hobbes have to say about why people form government?  What do they say about sovereignty, power, legitimacy, and interdependence? Do you agree with their theories?  How would YOU establish a government?
Hobbes, in Leviathan: Or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiasticall and Civil, described the true “state of nature” as all individuals being naturally equal. He stated that in this state every person could do what they needed to do to survive. This free will resulted in chaos and disorder among people because in what Hobbes describes are the state of nature there were no laws nor anyone to enforce any type of rule. Hobbes said that it was necessary to create a form of supreme power to enforce rules on everyone to maintain peace. This ultimately led to his belief in absolute monarchy.
Locke on the other hand believes differently. In Two Treatises of Government, Locke claimed that “ men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch,” (which almost sounds like a small stab at Hobbes.) He stated that humans have the right to life, liberty, and property, similar to our constitution. He also states that all men are free and equal. These claims justify the government as a result of a social contract. This social contract allows people to enjoy their rights, as well as transfer them to the government to provide peace and stability. There are a lot of connections to Locke’s philosophies and the U.S. Constitution, such as a representative government as well as the right to life, liberty, and property. 
Rousseau was the one who actually published  The Social Contract, which opened with, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.” This line aligns with the beliefs of Locke that people don't have to hand over their rights to  a single monarch. He claimed that the solution to the state of nature was to have people give up their rights to the whole community and not a king. Hobbes used the word sovereign to refer to a king, but Rousseau used this term to refer to the whole community. He believed in making laws to protect the greater good. 
In theory, I like and identify with the beliefs of Locke and Rousseau about creating laws for the greater good and having a representative government. This makes sense because we can draw so many parallels between their beliefs and many U.S. documents like the Constitution, as well as many philosophes present in our current government. I  personally have no idea how I would personally form a government, but I don't not like the Hobbes theory of being under a single monarch. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of Work - Connor Morley

Image
The future of work in America is, like any prediction, ultimately uncertain, but there are numerous factors that are contributing to what can be predicted. Through the careful gathering of data by the McKinsey global institute, it is plain to see what jobs/lines of work are likely set to thrive and which ones might be in danger. It seems to be the trend that the jobs most in danger of displacement are the ones that are on the lower end of the pay scale. This appears to be correlated highly with jobs whose workers do not possess college degrees, as evidenced by this graph: Which shows that college degrees are more important than ever in a global economy less willing to shell out the big bucks on manufacturing and blue-collar work than ever, even though they constitute the largest portion of jobs in the world relative to other occupations, which really illustrates certain inequalities brought-on by a country exemplifying a capitalist model, such as the United States.  ...
Read more

Hey Check This Out 12/11

 https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/11/republicans-discover-dangers-selling-bunk-their-constituents/617197/ This article from The Atlantic draws the parallels between the lead up to, and the aftermath of the 1860 and the 2020 US presidential elections.  The divisions between modern day Americans and the two political parties are similarly as divided as back in the 1850’s leading up to the election of 1860 in which Abraham Lincoln (a Republican) was elected, much to the outrage of the US South; As described in the article the fiery speeches in the US Congress and toxic political rhetoric and conspiracy theories that were prevalent in the lead up to the 1860 election, which can also be said about the harsh divisions in the current 2020 political climate. In some ways, electing Obama president in 2008 helped improve race relations on some levels, or at least it opened up more dialogue about several important topics that had been ignored or downplayed for too long; i...
Read more

Coronavirus and issues of Development and Power

Jorge Larach 5/20/20 GPHC Coronavirus and issues of Development and Power  I read two articles:  Why Rich Countries must Protect Developing Nations from Coronavirus Pandemic How is the United Nations responding to the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) / COVID-19 outbreak? Despite this assignment being due weeks ago, I still compared what these articles are talking about to today and processed the timeline provided in the second article (chronologically), as well as considered what the call to action of the first article was referring to. I think the first article provides a persuasive, fact-supported argument as to why higher-income countries should divert some of their attention to poorer countries, not just for the well being of those countries, but for theirs as well. It argues that if poorer countries are not given the support they need, monetary or otherwise, then not only will those countries be hit substantially harder than richer ones, but it will like...
Read more