One Country, Two Nationalities
Callista Wilson
Mr. Roddy
Global Politics and Historical Contexts
27 October 2019
Reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/world/asia/hong-kong-protests-identity.html
The
article, One Country, Two Nationalities, discusses how people in Hong
Kong are reacting to mainland China’s growing oversight through demonstrations,
separation within the region, and a growing sense that being a Hong Konger and
being Chinese may no longer be synonymous. It is explained that people within
the city are becoming and less trusting of immigrants and tourists from the
mainland, because they are causing work to become scarce, living prices to
increase, and a threat to the consistency of Cantonese culture. Also, many Hong
Kongers wish to isolate themselves from China’s undemocratic leadership, and
strive for more autonomy, while others do not believe in acting against the
police during protests, which has led to divisions within many
families.
When
reading this article, I found it interesting to think about how Hong Kong’s
history as a British colony allowed the region to become prosperous through
capitalist influence, however, now that Hong Kong is an administrative region
of China, it seems that the mainland’s influence is doing the opposite, and
decreasing the living standards of the people. For example, the article claims
that after Hong Kong became a region within China, “newly rich Chinese [people]
poured money into local real estate” and as a result of the increase in housing
prices in Hong Kong, “wages stalled or declined. What [people living in Hong
Kong] made bought far less. Many became less well-off than their parents had
been.” For these reasons, I believe it makes sense that Hong Kongers feel
differently about their identity relative to the rest of China, however, I also
believe that the most optimal course of action is not rooted in division or
separate nationalities.
The
strength of a hypothetically independent Hong Kong is questionable due to the
economic interdependence between them and the mainland. Also, although protests
have been helping to attract national attention toward the housing issues, and
the non-democratic leadership which Hong Kong is facing, demonstrations can
either inspire progress or cause damaging divisions. For this reason it may be
best for Hong Kong to remain an administrative region of China, however, the
“one country, two systems” agreement needs to be upheld for the sake of Hong
Kong’s economic future, and to support the living standards of all the regions
residents, despite their background.
Reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/world/asia/hong-kong-protests-identity.html
Comments